Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 4: Research Analysis NURS 6003

Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 4: Research Analysis NURS 6003

Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 4: Research Analysis NURS 6003

Assignment: Academic Success and
Professional Development Plan Part 4:
Research Analysis
Architect Daniel Libeskind is credited with saying “To provide meaningful architecture is not to
parody history, but to articulate it.” The suggestion is that his work does not copy the efforts of
others but relies on it.
Understanding the work of others is critically important to new work. Contributions to the
nursing body of knowledge can happen when you are able to analyze and articulate the efforts of
previous research. Hence research analysis skills are critical tools for your toolbox.
In this Assignment, you will locate relevant existing research. You also will analyze this research
using a tool helpful for analysis.
To Prepare:
 Reflect on the strategies presented in the Resources this week in support of locating and
analyzing research.
 Use the Walden Library to identify and read one peer-reviewed research article focused
on a topic of interest to you in your specialty field.
 Review the article you selected and reflect on the professional practice use of
theories/concepts as described by the article
The Assignment:
Using the ‘Week 4 | Part 4’ section of your Academic Success and Professional Development
Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research
article you identified. Be sure to include the following:
 Clearly identify the topic of interest you have selected.
 Provide an accurate and complete APA formatted citation of the article you selected,
along with link or search details.
 Clearly identify and describe in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts
presented in the article.
 Provide a clear and accurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix
section of the template.
 Write a 1-paragraph justification that clearly and accurately explains in detail whether
you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice. Note: You
can use the CARP method as presented in the Resources for this week on evaluating
resources.
 Write a 2- to 3-paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and
Professional Development Plan that includes the following:

o Clearly and accurately describe in detail your approach to identifying and
analyzing peer-reviewed research.
o Clearly identify and accurately describe in detail at least two strategies that you
would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.
o Provide a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one resource you
intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.
o Integrate at least one outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources to fully
support your summary.

Note: Add your work for this Assignment to the original document you began in the Week 1
Assignment, which was built off the Academic Success and Professional Development Plan
Template.
By Day 7
Submit your analysis, including your competed section of the Academic Success and
Professional Development Plan Template sections including your matrix and summary.
Remember to include an introduction paragraph which contains a clear and comprehensive
purpose statement which delineates all required criteria, and end the assignment Part with a
conclusion paragraph.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
 Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn+last name+first
initial.(extension)” as the name.
 Click the Week 4 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the
Assignment.
 Click the Week 4 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading
criteria from this area.
 Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the
document you saved as “WK4Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
 If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit
my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
 Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria

To access your rubric:
Week 4 Assignment Rubric

ORDER NOW FOR AN EXCELLENT PAPER FROM HEALTH CARE PAPER GURUS: Assignment: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Part 4: Research Analysis NURS 6003

Learning Resources
Required Readings

Al-Jundi, A., & Sakka, S. (2017). Critical appraisal of clinical research. Journal of Clinical and
Diagnostic Research: JCDR, 11(5), JE01–JE05. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2017/26047.9942

Shellenbarger, T. (2016). Simplifying synthesis. Nurse Author & Editor, 26(3). Retrieved from

Simplifying Synthesis

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Databases A-Z: Nursing. Retrieved October 4, 2019 from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/az.php?s=19981

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Evaluating resources: Journals. Retrieved October 4, 2019,
from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/evaluating/resource-types/journals

Walden University Library. (n.d.). Instructional media: Fundamentals of library research.
Retrieved October 4, 2019 from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/instructionalmedia/researchfundamentals

Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Retrieved October 12, 2018, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/home

Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Common assignments: Synthesizing your
sources. https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/assignments/literaturereview/synthesi
zing

Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Scholarly writing: Overview. Retrieved October 12,
2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/scholarly

Walden University. (n.d.). Subject Research: Nursing. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from
https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/subject/nursing

Walden University Writing Center. (n.d.). Webinars: Technical information. Retrieved October
12, 2018, from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/technical

Document: Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template (Word document)

Document: Introduction to scholarly writing: Tips for success (PDF)

Required Media
Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing:
Purpose, Audience, and Evidence [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Laureate Education, Inc. (Executive Producer). (2018). Introduction to Scholarly Writing: Tips
for Success [Video file]. Baltimore, MD: Author.

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Using the Week 4 Part 4 section of your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan Template presented in the Resources, conduct an analysis of the elements of the research article you identified. Be sure to include the following:

·   The topic of interest you have selected.

·   Correctly formatted APA citation of the article you selected, along with link or search details.

·   Identify a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response clearly identifies the topic of interest selected.

The response accurately and completely provides a citation of the article selected, including an accurate and complete link or thorough search details.

The response clearly identifies and describes in detail a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response partially identifies the topic of interest selected.

The response provides a partial citation of the article selected, including a partial link or search details.

The response partially identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response vaguely identifies the topic of interest selected.

The response vaguely or inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague or inaccurate search details.

The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies the topic of interest selected, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately provides a citation of the article selected, including vague and inaccurate search details, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes a professional practice use of the theories/concepts presented in the article, or is missing.

Analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

·   Write a one-paragraph justification explaining whether or not you would recommend the use of this article to inform professional practice.

Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%)
The response clearly and accurately provides a detailed analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

The response clearly and accurately explains in detail the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)
The response provides a partial analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

The response partially explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%)
The response provides a vague or inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template.

The response vaguely or inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%)
The response provides a vague and inaccurate analysis of the article using the Research Analysis Matrix section of the template, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately explains the justification of whether or not to recommend the use of the article to inform professional practice, or is missing.

Write a 2-3 paragraph summary that you will add to your Academic Success and Professional Development Plan that includes the following:

·   Describe your approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.

·   Identify at least two strategies that you would use that you found to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

·   Identify at least one resource you intend to use in the future to find peer-reviewed research.

Points Range: 41 (41%) – 45 (45%)
The response clearly and accurately describes in detail the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.

The response clearly identifies and accurately describes in detail at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

The response provides a complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response fully integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that fully supports the summary provided.

Points Range: 36 (36%) – 40 (40%)
The response partially describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.

The response partially identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

The response provides an accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2-3 course specific resources that support the summary provided.

Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response vaguely or inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research.

The response vaguely or inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research.

The response vaguely or inaccurately synthesizes at least one outside resource that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 31 (31%)
The response vaguely and inaccurately describes the approach to identifying and analyzing peer-reviewed research, or is missing.

The response vaguely and inaccurately identifies and describes at least two strategies used to be effective in finding peer-reviewed research, or is missing.

The response fails to integrate any resources that may be used in the future to find peer-reviewed research to support the summary provided, or is missing.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:
Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, running head, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.
Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100