BHA FPX 4020 Capella University Health Care Professional Feedback Paper Assignment

BHA FPX 4020 Capella University Health Care Professional Feedback Paper Assignment

BHA FPX 4020 Capella University Health Care Professional Feedback Paper Assignment

Question Description
I’m trying to study for my Management course and I need some help to understand this question.

Present a health care problem analysis proposal to a practicing health care professional, obtain feedback, and gain approval for the data review project. Negotiate changes to the project scope, focus, or execution based upon the professional’s feedback. Submit the revised and approved proposal with an addendum summarizing the feedback received.

The ability to articulate the potential impact of a project in a concise manner to project stakeholders can impact the successful implementation of any change initiative. The successful outcome of a project depends upon your ability to communicate effectively and to prepare for meetings with important stakeholders.

This assessment is crucial to the success of your health care problem analysis proposal. It provides an opportunity to refine your project proposal and to incorporate feedback from a practicing health care professional. The feedback meeting represents an opportunity for either a one-time or ongoing contact with the practicing health care professional. The health care problem analysis project is designed to add value to a selected health care organization while addressing your professional development goals.

DEMONSTRATION OF PROFICIENCY
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

Competency 1: Evaluate problems in health care organizations, and apply tools to improve quality and outcomes.
Negotiate changes to project scope, execution, or focus, based on feedback solicited from the health care professional.
Obtain approval for a proposed project.
Competency 2: Analyze foundational elements of the U.S. health care system.
Identify the appropriate health care professional in an organization from whom to seek approval for a proposed project.
Present a project proposal to the selected practicing health care professional.
PREPARATION
To successfully complete this second course assessment, you will:

Integrate faculty member feedback and update your health care problem analysis proposal.
Conduct background research on the prospective health care organization.
Identify an appropriate health care professional within the organization from whom to seek approval for the proposed project.
Consider individuals with the requisite decision-making authority who are best able to provide guidance and recommendations.
Within the organization, be sure to identify a first and second choice health care professional for feedback.
Review the Practicing Health Care Professional Meeting and Project Approval Guide [DOCX] before contacting the selected health care professional.
The information provided in this document will help you to prepare for the meeting, present the health care problem analysis proposal, and obtain approval for the project from the health care professional. The resource document provides guidance, recommendations, and examples that are crucial for successful completion of this assessment.
Research best practices for professional communication and feedback as part of your interview preparation.
Reflect upon your experience in human services and health care administration relevant to the proposed project. Based on the ACHE competencies, is the proposed project realistic?
Prepare a list of questions to ask the selected health care professional. The Practicing Health Care Professional Meeting and Project Approval Guide offers guidance in preparing questions.
INSTRUCTIONS
During the meeting with the practicing health care professional on the health care problem analysis proposal, you are expected to complete all of the following:

Present the proposal to the selected practicing health care professional and actively solicit feedback. Do take notes, as the feedback you receive will be placed in an addendum as part of the assessment.
Negotiate changes to project scope, focus, or execution, based upon the health care professional’s feedback.
Note: Plan to arrive at the meeting with proposed performance indicators related to the identified health care issue. However, remember that these may change for a variety of reasons based upon the health care professional’s feedback. For example, the indicators you identified may not be included in the organization’s data sets. Or the individual may advise that different indicators may be more helpful. It is your responsibility to verify, discover, or redefine the performance indicators before proceeding with the project. Using the same performance indicators as the organization will make the final data comparison much easier.
After the meeting, you are expected to complete all of the following:

Revise the proposal based upon the health care professional’s feedback.
Please ensure that any negotiated revisions to the proposal meet the course requirements. For example, human subjects research is outside the scope of this course.
Obtain approval for the proposed data review project from the health care professional.
Ensure the revised proposal is a collaborative effort between you and the health care professional that meets organizational requirements, such as confidentiality.
Be sure to consider your role and responsibilities with the health care professional during fulfillment of the data review project.
Submit the revised, signed copy of the proposal as the deliverable for this assessment.
Include the client’s signature, title, and contact information.
Include an addendum summarizing any relevant categorical feedback offered by the health care professional.
Scan the entire revised proposal, including the signature page, and attach the file in the assessment area for Assessment 2.
ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS
Length: The topic’s nature, breadth, and depth will determine the assessment’s length. The guideline is to remain succinct yet substantive and to provide enough detail to adequately address the topic.
Font: Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.
Format: Submit the revised, approved proposal and the addendum summarizing the feedback received to the assessment submission area in the courseroom for Assessment 2.

ORDER NOW FOR AN EXCELLENT PAPER FROM HEALTH CARE PAPER GURUS: BHA FPX 4020 Capella University Health Care Professional Feedback Paper Assignment

 

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS

Discussion Questions (DQ)

Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation

Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality

Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes

I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy

For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy

The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication

Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.

Description

Present a health care problem analysis proposal to a practicing health care professional, obtain feedback, and gain approval for the data review project. Negotiate changes to the project scope, focus, or execution based upon the professional’s feedback. Submit the revised and approved proposal with an addendum summarizing the feedback received.

The ability to articulate the potential impact of a project in a concise manner to project stakeholders can impact the successful implementation of any change initiative. The successful outcome of a project depends upon your ability to communicate effectively and to prepare for meetings with important stakeholders.

This assessment is crucial to the success of your health care problem analysis proposal. It provides an opportunity to refine your project proposal and to incorporate feedback from a practicing health care professional. The feedback meeting represents an opportunity for either a one-time or ongoing contact with the practicing health care professional. The health care problem analysis project is designed to add value to a selected health care organization while addressing your professional development goals.

Demonstration of Proficiency

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate proficiency in the following course competencies and assessment criteria:

  • Competency 1: Evaluate problems in health care organizations, and apply tools to improve quality and outcomes.
    • Negotiate changes to project scope, execution, or focus, based on feedback solicited from the health care professional.
    • Obtain approval for a proposed project.
  • Competency 2: Analyze foundational elements of the U.S. health care system.
    • Identify the appropriate health care professional in an organization from whom to seek approval for a proposed project.
    • Present a project proposal to the selected practicing health care professional.

Preparation

To successfully complete this second course assessment, you will:

  • Integrate faculty member feedback and update your health care problem analysis proposal.
  • Conduct background research on the prospective health care organization.
    • Identify an appropriate health care professional within the organization from whom to seek approval for the proposed project.
      • Consider individuals with the requisite decision-making authority who are best able to provide guidance and recommendations.
    • Within the organization, be sure to identify a first and second choice health care professional for feedback.
  • Review the Practicing Health Care Professional Meeting and Project Approval Guide [DOCX] before contacting the selected health care professional.
    • The information provided in this document will help you to prepare for the meeting, present the health care problem analysis proposal, and obtain approval for the project from the health care professional. The resource document provides guidance, recommendations, and examples that are crucial for successful completion of this assessment.
  • Research best practices for professional communication and feedback as part of your interview preparation.
  • Reflect upon your experience in human services and health care administration relevant to the proposed project. Based on the ACHE competencies, is the proposed project realistic?
  • Prepare a list of questions to ask the selected health care professional. The Practicing Health Care Professional Meeting and Project Approval Guide offers guidance in preparing questions.

Instructions

During the meeting with the practicing health care professional on the health care problem analysis proposal, you are expected to complete all of the following:

  • Present the proposal to the selected practicing health care professional and actively solicit feedback. Do take notes, as the feedback you receive will be placed in an addendum as part of the assessment.
  • Negotiate changes to project scope, focus, or execution, based upon the health care professional’s feedback.
    • Note: Plan to arrive at the meeting with proposed performance indicators related to the identified health care issue. However, remember that these may change for a variety of reasons based upon the health care professional’s feedback. For example, the indicators you identified may not be included in the organization’s data sets. Or the individual may advise that different indicators may be more helpful. It is your responsibility to verify, discover, or redefine the performance indicators before proceeding with the project. Using the same performance indicators as the organization will make the final data comparison much easier.

After the meeting, you are expected to complete all of the following:

  • Revise the proposal based upon the health care professional’s feedback.
    • Please ensure that any negotiated revisions to the proposal meet the course requirements. For example, human subjects research is outside the scope of this course.
  • Obtain approval for the proposed data review project from the health care professional.
    • Ensure the revised proposal is a collaborative effort between you and the health care professional that meets organizational requirements, such as confidentiality.
    • Be sure to consider your role and responsibilities with the health care professional during fulfillment of the data review project.
  • Submit the revised, signed copy of the proposal as the deliverable for this assessment.
    • Include the client’s signature, title, and contact information.
    • Include an addendum summarizing any relevant categorical feedback offered by the health care professional.
    • Scan the entire revised proposal, including the signature page, and attach the file in the assessment area for Assessment 2.

Additional Requirements

  • Length: The topic’s nature, breadth, and depth will determine the assessment’s length. The guideline is to remain succinct yet substantive and to provide enough detail to adequately address the topic.
  • Font: Use Times New Roman, 12-point font.
  • Format: Submit the revised, approved proposal and the addendum summarizing the feedback received to the assessment submission area in the courseroom for Assessment 2.